Submission Guidelines - Revision history

BNEditor at 22:56, 31 March 2009

BNEditor — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:56:45 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 31 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== General Guidelines ==		== General Guidelines ==

-	The Science Besieged Project welcomes additional views and voices that are aligned with its goals. We encourage those with something to add to contact us with their ideas, or to ask that we suggest some. The statement of goals is kept in the article [[~~Science Besieged Project~~:About]].	+	The Science Besieged Project welcomes additional views and voices that are aligned with its goals. We encourage those with something to add to contact us with their ideas, or to ask that we suggest some. The statement of goals is kept in the article [[Scienticity:About]].

	Articles can be short and specific miniatures of 500 to 700 words, up to full-course features of 5000 to 7000 words, so long as they treat their subject adequately. Organize your material, note your sources, but don't stifle your expression.		Articles can be short and specific miniatures of 500 to 700 words, up to full-course features of 5000 to 7000 words, so long as they treat their subject adequately. Organize your material, note your sources, but don't stifle your expression.

JNShaumeyer at 22:57, 28 December 2005

JNShaumeyer — Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:57:00 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 28 December 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Existing articles can serve as models, but they're not the last word. Look at [[Special:Allpages \| all article titles]] for something that might help or, if that's too much choice, try a [[Special:Random \| random page]].		Existing articles can serve as models, but they're not the last word. Look at [[Special:Allpages \| all article titles]] for something that might help or, if that's too much choice, try a [[Special:Random \| random page]].

-	Contact us through ~~email: besieged~~ [~~at] ArsHermeneutica~~ [~~dot~~] ~~org~~.	+	Contact us by e-mail through the [[Special:CommentForm \| Comment Form]].

	== Suggestions for Articles ==		== Suggestions for Articles ==

JNShaumeyer at 17:02, 30 October 2005

JNShaumeyer — Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:02:19 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 30 October 2005
Line 24:		Line 24:
	See our [[Style Manual]] for more pedantic guidance on commas and such matters.		See our [[Style Manual]] for more pedantic guidance on commas and such matters.

-	{{Category:Metatopics}}	+	[[Category:Metatopics]]

JNShaumeyer at 01:52, 28 October 2005

JNShaumeyer — Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:52:17 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 28 October 2005
Line 23:		Line 23:

	See our [[Style Manual]] for more pedantic guidance on commas and such matters.		See our [[Style Manual]] for more pedantic guidance on commas and such matters.
		+
		+	{{Category:Metatopics}}

JNShaumeyer at 19:24, 20 October 2005

JNShaumeyer — Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:24:33 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 20 October 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{In progress}}~~	+	== General Guidelines ==
		+
		+	The Science Besieged Project welcomes additional views and voices that are aligned with its goals. We encourage those with something to add to contact us with their ideas, or to ask that we suggest some. The statement of goals is kept in the article [[Science Besieged Project:About]].
		+
		+	Articles can be short and specific miniatures of 500 to 700 words, up to full-course features of 5000 to 7000 words, so long as they treat their subject adequately. Organize your material, note your sources, but don't stifle your expression.
		+
		+	Existing articles can serve as models, but they're not the last word. Look at [[Special:Allpages \| all article titles]] for something that might help or, if that's too much choice, try a [[Special:Random \| random page]].
		+
		+	Contact us through email: besieged [at] ArsHermeneutica [dot] org.

	== Suggestions for Articles ==		== Suggestions for Articles ==
Line 8:		Line 16:
	* Reviews of situations in the continuing struggle of science against anti-science forces.		* Reviews of situations in the continuing struggle of science against anti-science forces.
	* Studies that illustrate the value of science in society and society's reaction to science.		* Studies that illustrate the value of science in society and society's reaction to science.
		+	* Essays about the role of science in society.
		+
		+	For other ideas, look at all the yet-to-be-written titles in the [[Outline \| Project Outline]].
		+
		+	== Furthermore ==
		+
		+	See our [[Style Manual]] for more pedantic guidance on commas and such matters.

JNShaumeyer at 18:57, 20 October 2005

JNShaumeyer — Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:57:25 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 20 October 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Suggestions for Articles ==		== Suggestions for Articles ==

-	* Profiles of scientists and science advocates who have engaged the public in an attempt to increase the public's awareness~~, understanding,~~ and appreciation of scientific topics.	+	* Profiles of scientists and science advocates who have engaged the public in an attempt to increase the public's awareness and appreciation of scientific topics.
-	* Reports that ~~docuement~~ outbreaks of anti-scientism.	+	* Pieces that enrich our understanding of the history of science in society.
		+	* Reports that document outbreaks of anti-scientism.
	* Reviews of situations in the continuing struggle of science against anti-science forces.		* Reviews of situations in the continuing struggle of science against anti-science forces.
	* Studies that illustrate the value of science in society and society's reaction to science.		* Studies that illustrate the value of science in society and society's reaction to science.

JNShaumeyer at 17:57, 20 October 2005

JNShaumeyer — Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:57:06 GMT

New page

{{In progress}}

== Suggestions for Articles ==

* Profiles of scientists and science advocates who have engaged the public in an attempt to increase the public's awareness, understanding, and appreciation of scientific topics.
* Reports that docuement outbreaks of anti-scientism.
* Reviews of situations in the continuing struggle of science against anti-science forces.
* Studies that illustrate the value of science in society and society's reaction to science.